Anokhina refused to recognize social media posts as a crime.
Dagestani journalist Svetlana Anokhina, who lives abroad, admitted to writing the posts that formed the basis for the verdict in the army fake news case, but she doesn't consider them a crime.
As reported by the "Caucasian Knot," a court in Makhachkala found journalist and human rights activist Svetlana Anokhina, who lives abroad, guilty of spreading fake news about the army and sentenced her in absentia to five years in prison. Anokhina was previously arrested in absentia in Dagestan; a 37-year-old native of the republic is also facing a similar case. Svetlana Anokhina, a journalist and human rights activist who fled Dagestan due to threats, learned about a criminal case under the article on public dissemination of knowingly false information about the use of the Russian armed forces from the media in April 2023. In September 2024, Anokhina reported that security forces visited her 95-year-old mother to take a saliva sample. Anokhina called these actions intimidation of the elderly woman. "What does my mother and her saliva have to do with this? What are you going to compare it to? With my traces on the internet?" she demanded.
Article 207.3 of the Russian Criminal Code was introduced on March 4, 2022, after the beginning of the Russian operation in Ukraine. This article of the Russian Criminal Code contradicts the Constitution of Russia, as well as the basic principles of law, stated the Memorial Human Rights Center*. "The wording of the article does not allow us to determine in advance which statements are lawful and which are prohibited. A citizen cannot know in advance which statements or information may be considered false in this context," the human rights activists emphasized.
Svetlana Anokhina told a "Caucasian Knot" correspondent that she hasn't yet seen the reasoning behind the verdict, but while she admits to writing the posts, she refuses to plead guilty.
"Yes, I wrote these posts, but I don't consider it a crime. That is, I agree that I wrote them, and I don't agree that it should be punished in any way," she said.
She hasn't yet decided whether to appeal the verdict. "I haven't spoken to my lawyer about the appeal yet, so I can't say anything more specific," Anokhina noted.
Gadzhimurad Sagitov, a member of the Board of the Dagestan Regional Branch of the Union of Journalists of Russia, said that he refused to give any personal assessments of her activities during the investigation and trial.
"I wouldn't want to give any assessments at all or provide any information about her. I stated this in court and during questioning during the investigation, when I was forced to testify as her former employer," he told a "Caucasian Knot" correspondent.
According to the journalist, the trial was conducted objectively.
"There was an adversarial nature, all parties were represented, and the judge was very polite. There was no pressure, and the defense had an excellent opportunity to request and demand whatever they deemed necessary. I can't comment on the other details of this trial. But on the day I testified, everything was quite transparent; there was no sense of bias," Sagitov explained.
Svetlana Anokhina reported that the case against her included testimony from Gadzhimurad Sagitov, the former editor-in-chief of the Novoye Delo publication. Anokhina, who previously worked for the publication, noted that she last saw Sagitov in 2019, Mediazona previously reported*.
Svetlana Anokhina is a journalist and human rights activist. For the past several years, she has published for Daptar, a publication that actively writes about women's rights and crimes against them in the Caucasus. She is the founder of the Marem crisis center, which provides assistance to women in difficult situations.
In August 2022, Anokhina told the "Caucasian Knot" that since 2020, she and the human rights organization "Marem" have been able to evacuate more than 50 women fleeing domestic violence from Dagestan, Ingushetia, and Chechnya. "Initially, we looked for various options. If there was a possibility of returning, we spoke with relatives. If the family was religious, we tried to influence them through a mullah or religious authority, depending on whether they were Sufis or Salafists. Evacuation was a last resort. "Now the only option left is evacuation," she noted.
On June 10, 2021, Dagestani security forces and their Chechen colleagues arrived at a shelter in Makhachkala - an apartment for victims of domestic violence - to pick up Chechen resident Khalimat Taramova, who had fled the republic. Human rights activist and journalist Svetlana Anokhina, as well as Iraida Smirnova, were in the shelter and Maisarat Kilyaskhanova were injured. They were accused of resisting police, but all those detained were acquitted by the Makhachkala court.
In June 2024, the Sovietsky District Court of Makhachkala found a violation of the rights of Svetlana Anokhina, Iraida Smirnova, and Maisarat Kilyaskhanova, ordering the Ministry of Internal Affairs to pay three thousand rubles to each of them. In their lawsuit, the victims demanded compensation for moral damages in the amount of 445,000, 519,000, and 630,000 rubles. In November 2024, the appellate court increased the compensation amount from three to 15,000 rubles. The amount of 15,000 rubles for each victim is inappropriate for the scale of the damage and violates the principle of fairness, lawyers pointed out in the cassation appeal complaint. The Court of Cassation overturned these decisions and returned the claim for a new trial.
In 2016, Svetlana Anokhina won an award for journalists writing about the Caucasus for her article "Circumcised Women Cut Their Daughters." The competition is held in memory of Dagestani journalist Akhmednabi Akhmednabiyev. A journalist for the "Caucasian Knot," Akhmednabi Akhmednabiyev, was shot dead on July 9, 2013, in the village of Semender in Dagestan.
Translated automatically via Google translate from https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/420101