An accusation of indecent assault against a Kuban pensioner has outraged Telegram users.

Investigators have charged a pensioner from the village of Dinskaya with indecent assault, after teenagers vacationing on the beach testified against him. Telegram users have accused the 90-year-old man of slander.

As reported by the "Caucasian Knot," on October 5, it was reported that a 90-year-old pensioner from the village of Dinskaya, accused of indecent assault, was released from a psychiatric hospital in Krasnodar after 23 days of a comprehensive forensic examination.

The pensioner was charged under Part 3 of Article 135 of the Russian Criminal Code [indecent acts against two or more persons; [The sentence carries a sentence of five to 12 years in prison], the defendant's lawyer, Alexei Avanesyan, reported on his Telegram channel on October 23.

The examination confirmed that the defendant is sane and does not suffer from any sexual disorders.

"The measure chosen is a written undertaking [not to leave]. The investigation is closed, in short. The defense's evidence (the crime scene inspection report and the expert's report) has not been filed in the case file, despite the court's final decision on the illegality of refusing to include one of them. Furthermore, the inpatient forensic examination, which we were familiarized with yesterday, confirmed that the defendant is sane and does not suffer from any sexual disorders, including pedophilia," he wrote.

He also published an excerpt from the expert's findings. "The subject's consciousness is not impaired. He is outwardly calm, his behavior is orderly, and he is friendly. He readily engages in conversation. He answers questions to the point, without excessive detail. He was unable to give the current date, but correctly stated the year, season, and month. He is self-aware, correctly stated his date of birth and age, and is oriented correctly in place and space. He understands the purpose of being referred for examination. He does not consider himself guilty," the examination results state.

On October 26, Avanesyan added that after reviewing all the materials of the criminal case, he "named 24 people to be summoned to court for questioning and to confirm the defense's position."

The defense's position is that the incident (indecent acts) did not occur, he emphasized. "My list includes witnesses, specialists, psychologists and teachers, treating physicians and parents of minors, and, of course, investigators and their assistants, who were once again listed as witnesses, contrary to the law and internal orders. P.S. The indictment has not yet been sent to the prosecutor's office. 'He's combing his hair,' as the investigators like to say," the publication states.

They rattled off memorized and identical formulations and left.

Avanesyan also reported that on October 22, during the identification process, the teenagers "pointed to the grandfather." "And he, naturally, didn't identify them, since he'd never seen them. The detectives found a couple more elderly extras in the village, but naturally, they were younger than our 90-year-old," the lawyer wrote.

According to the lawyer, the teenagers were mistakenly considered victims. The "victims," speaking quickly and looking at the floor, in the presence of their mothers and a psychologist, rattled off memorized, identical statements and left. There was no confrontation with them. We remained to participate in further investigative actions. In total, with breaks, they lasted six hours. "During this time, the grandfather ran to the toilet 30 times and fell asleep right in the chair 20 times," the post says.

They came up with this nonsense in a heightened state of puberty.

Comments on the lawyer's posts sharply criticized the position of both the teenagers and their representatives, as well as the investigators. "God, what a disgrace... A disgrace," wrote, in particular, Captain u_lyalya. "They came up with this nonsense in a heightened state of puberty, and now, of course, where can you back off, the 'I'm a mother' has joined in. You can't tell your mother you came up with nonsense," he added in another comment.

"Yeah. Young people have arrived. "We expected an era of mercy, but these eras only become more brutal with each passing year," Insurgent stated. "These aren't the young people doing this. These are fully grown adults earning money and epaulets this way," Eugene Kozarez countered.

"The most that can be seen in his actions is petty hooliganism, and even that's a stretch. Every guy who urinated in the bushes should be charged under Article 135 of the Criminal Code, based on this position," Irina Serbskaya noted.

Why such zeal in charging a gravely ill old man?

"What do they [the investigators] get for this? Will they be given medals or bonuses? "Why such zeal in accusing a gravely ill old man? Sorry, this is an amateur question," wrote MN.

"The machine needs to work. Otherwise, it's a long wait for the next rank. And zeal for service has always been rewarded. And who gets caught [as a suspect] is a matter of chance... If you don't keep up, the system will squeeze you out. One way or another," explained Alexshverinez. "Terrible," MN responded.