House in the Azerbaijani village of Chyamyanly constantly shelled from the neighboring side. Photo: Sputnik / Murad Orujov

11 October 2018, 14:21

Azerbaijan fixes 25 attacks on Armenian border

Over the past 24 hours, positions of the Azerbaijani Army were shelled in two border areas, in particular, in one village, the Azeri Ministry of Defence (MoD) has stated.

The "Caucasian Knot" has reported that on October 10, Azerbaijan recorded shelling in five villages. In its turn, Nagorno-Karabakh earlier declared 150 shelling attacks from the Azerbaijani side during the week from September 30 to October 6.

On October 10-11, the ceasefire regime in the Karabakh conflict zone was violated for 25 times. The positions of the Azerbaijani army stationed in the village of Agdam and on the nameless heights of the Tovuz District, as well as on the territory of the Gadabay District, were shelled, the website of the Azerbaijani MoD has reported today. Both areas, according to the Yandex.Maps, border on Armenia.

Today, as of 8:55 a.m. Moscow time, the MoDs of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh had not posted any statements regarding the shelling information in their official websites.

This article was originally published on the Russian page of 24/7 Internet agency ‘Caucasian Knot’ on October 11, 2018 at 09:17 am MSK. To access the full text of the article, click here.

All news

January 21, 2019 18:58

January 21, 2019 18:52

  • Three Russian servicemen perish in Abkhazia

    Five servicemen from the Russian military base situated in Abkhazia fell victim to a fall of an armoured personnel carrier (APC) into the gorge, the Southern Military District has reported.

January 21, 2019 14:40

January 21, 2019 14:30

  • Oyub Titiev's defence persuades court to question fingerprint expert

    The fingerprint examinations of the package with the narcotic drug, which, according to law enforcers, was seized from Oyub Titiev, were held with violations, the defence of the head of the Grozny office of the Human Rights Centre (HRC) "Memorial" has stated. The court did not question the expert who came to the session, but agreed to summon another expert for questioning.

January 21, 2019 11:35

News archive